10th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication
September 3-5, 2025
Download printable PDF version of Final Program and Abstracts
PROGRAM
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3
Welcome
The Drummond Rennie Lecture
Forward to the Past—Making Contributors Accountable
Ana Marušić (Croatia)
Abstract
Author and Reviewer Use of AI
Authors Self-disclosed Use of Artificial Intelligence in Research: Submissions to 49 BMJ Group Biomedical Journals
Isamme AlFayyad, Maurice Zeegers, Lex Bouter, Helen Macdonald, Sara Schroter (Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence Use and Acknowledgment in Medical Research Writing Among Chinese Scholars
Yang Zhang, Mengyuan Duan, Guoguang Zhao, Penghu Wei, Xiuyuan Hao (China)
Abstract
Factors Associated With Author and Reviewer Declared Use of AI in Medical Journals
Roy Perlis, Annette Flanagin, Michael Berkwits, Jacob Kendall-Taylor, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo (United States)
Abstract
Quantifying and Assessing the Use of Generative AI by Authors and Reviewers in the Cancer Research Field
Daniel Evanko, Michael Di Natale (United States)
Abstract
Authorship and Integrity Issues
Comparison of Reasons for Retraction of Biomedical Articles by Women and Men Authors
Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes, Carinna Hockham, Mark Woodward (United Kingdom)
Abstract
Paper Mill Use of Fake Personas to Manipulate the Peer Review Process
Tim Kersjes (Netherlands)
Abstract
Authorship Changes as an Indicator of Research Integrity Concerns in Submissions to Academic Journals
Coromoto Power Febres, Julia Gunn, Laura Wilson (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Notifying Authors That They Have Cited a Retracted Article and Future Citations of Retracted Articles: The RetractoBot Randomized Controlled Trial
Nicholas DeVito, Christine Cunningham, Ben Goldacre (United Kingdom)
Abstract
How a Questionable Research Network Manipulated Scholarly Publishing
Leslie McIntosh, Hélène Draux, Elizabeth Smee, Cynthia Hudson Vitale (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Diversity and Research Environment
An Analysis of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Concerns From JAMA Network Peer Reviewers
Michael Mensah, Anand Habib, Jacob Kendall-Taylor, Mya Roberson, Kanade Shinkai, Annette Flanagin, Preeti Malani (United States)
Abstract
Assessment of an Intervention to Equalize the Proportion of Funded Grant Applications for Underrepresented Groups at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Anne Lasinsky, James Wrightson, Matthew Hogel, Alannah Brown, Adrian Mota, Karim Khan, Clare Ardern (Canada)
Abstract
Extracting Research Environment Indicators From the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021 Statements
Noémie Aubert Bonn, Lukas Hughes-Noehrer (United Kingdom)
Abstract
Research Misconduct and Integrity
Characterizing Problematic Images in Retracted Scientific Articles
João Phillipe Cardenuto, Daniel Moreira, Anderson Rocha (Brazil, United States)
Abstract
Misidentification of Scanning Electron Microscope Instruments in the Peer-Reviewed Materials Science and Engineering Literature
Reese Richardson, Jeonghyun Moon, Spencer Hong, Luís Amaral (United States)
Abstract
Retractions and Democracy Index Scores Across 167 countries
Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi, Hesam Salmabadi (Canada)
Abstract
Indicators of Small-Scale and Large-Scale Citation Concentration Patterns
Iakovos Evdaimon, John Ioannidis, Giannis Nikolentzos, Michail Chatzianastasis, George Panagopoulos, Michalis Vazirgiannis (France, Greece, Luxembourg, United States)
Abstract
Scale and Resilience in Organizations Enabling Systematic Scientific Fraud
Reese Richardson, Spencer Hong, Jennifer Byrne, Thomas Stoeger, Luís Amaral (Australia, United States)
Abstract | Article published in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (32) e2420092122, doi:10.1073/pnas.2420092122 (2025)
Patterns of Paper Mill Papers and Retraction Challenges
Anna Abalkina, Svetlana Kleiner (Germany, Netherlands)
Abstract
Sustainable Approaches to Upholding High Integrity Standards in the Face of Large-Scale Threats: Insights From PLOS One
Renee Hoch, Emily Chenette (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Back to Top
Thursday, September 4
Morning Welcome and Housekeeping
The Douglas G. Altman Lecture
Does the Journal Article Have a Future?
Malcolm MacLeod (Scotland)
Abstract
Bias, Study Outcomes, and Reporting Concerns
Immortal Time Bias Prevalence and Influence on Estimates in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Jae Il Shin, Minseo Kim, Dong Keon Yon, Seung Won Lee, Masoud Rahmati, Marco Solmi, André Carvalho, Ai Koyanagi, Lee Smith, John Ioannidis (Australia, Canada, Iran, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Effect Estimates for the Same Outcomes Designated as Primary vs Secondary in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Meta-Research Study
Yiwen Jiang, Yuanxi Jia, Karen Robinson, Jinling Tang (China, Singapore, United States)
Abstract
Detection and Monitoring of Outcome Reporting Changes Using a Large Language Model: Application to FDA-Regulated Drug Trials
Ian Bulovic, Susmitha Wunnava, Wonjin Yoon, Adam Dunn, Timothy Miller, Florence Bourgeois (Australia, United States)
Abstract
Data Repurpose in AI Studies and Scientific Outcomes
Yulin Yu, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Daniel Romero (United States)
Abstract
Prevalence of the Statement “to Our Knowledge” and Similar Paraphrases in Current and Past Biomedical Literature
Nicola Di Girolamo, Reint Meursinge Reynders, Ugo Di Girolamo (Netherlands, United States)
Abstract
Peer Review Models
Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Assessments
Alexander Goldberg, Ivan Stelmakh, Kyunghyun Cho, Alice Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, Nihar Shah (Russia, South Korea, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Charvi Rastogi, Xiangchen Song, Zhijing Jin, Ivan Stelmakh, Hal Daume, Kun Zhang, Nihar Shah (Russia, United States)
Abstract | Article published in PLoS ONE 19(12): e0315674. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315674
Dual Anonymous and Distributed Peer Review for Proposal Review Rankings at the ALMA Observatory
John Carpenter, Andrea Corvillon (Chile)
Abstract
Comparison of Content in Published and Unpublished Peer Review Reports
Elena Álvarez- García, Daniel Garcia-Costa, Flaminio Squazzoni, Mario Malički, Bahar Mehmani, Francisco Grimaldo (Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United States)
Abstract
Editorial and Publishing Processes and Models
Changes to Research Article Abstracts Between Submission and Publication
Christos Kotanidis, Sarah Gorey, Harleen Marwah, Abarna Pearl, Darren Taichman, Mary Beth Hamel (United States)
Abstract | Article published in Ann Intern Med. [Epub 2 September 2025]. doi:10.7326/ANNALS-25-02250
Manuscript Characteristics Associated With Editorial Review and Peer Review Outcomes at Science and Science Advances
Nicholas LaBerge, Sam Zhang, Daniel Larremore, Aaron Clauset (United States)
Abstract
Investigating Changes in Common Vocabulary Terms in eLife Assessments Across Versions in a Publish, Review, Curate Model
Nicola Adamson, Andy Collings (United Kingdom)
Abstract
Peer Review Times and Payment Incentives
Results of Testing the Gold Standard 2-Week Reviewer Deadline
Emilie Gunn, Kelly Brooks, Stephanie Valladao (United States)
Abstract
Analysis of Decisions and Lead-Time in Ethical Review Boards in Sweden
Emmanuel Zavalis, Love Ahnström, Natasha Ohlsson, Gustave Nilsonne (Sweden)
Abstract
Monetary Incentives for Peer Review at a Medical Journal: A Quasi-Randomized Experimental Study
Christopher Cotton, Abid Alam, Sophie Tosta, Timothy Buchman, David Maslove (Canada, United States)
Abstract | Article published in Critical Care Medicine 53(6):p e1181-e1189, June 2025. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006637
Exploring Views on Remuneration for Review: A Survey of BMJ’s Patient and Public Reviewers
Sara Schroter, Rebecca Harmstron, Emma Doble, Sophie Cook, Amy Price (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Journal Prestige Can and Should Be Earned
Simine Vazire (Australia)
Abstract
Back to Top
Friday, September 5
Morning Welcome and Housekeeping
A Singular Disruption of Scientific Publishing—AI Proliferation and Blurred Responsibilities of Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
Zak Kohane (US)
Abstract
Use of AI to Assess Quality and Reporting
Natural Language Processing to Assess the Role of Preprints in COVID-19 Policy Guidance
Nicholas Evans, Samuel Angelli-Nichols, Emma Chang-Rabley, Yara Omar, Rachel Nas, Mikaela Finnegan, Rocco Casagrande, Emily Ricotta (United States)
Abstract
Leveraging Large Language Models for Assessing the Adherence of Randomized Controlled Trial Publications to Reporting Guidelines
Lan Jiang, Xiangji Ying, Mengfei Lan, Andrew Brown, Colby Vorland, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Halil Kilicoglu (United States)
Abstract
Understanding How a Language Model Assesses the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: Applying SHapley Additive exPlanations to Encoder Transformer Classification Models
Fangwen Zhou, Muhammad Afzal, Rick Parrish, Ashirbani Saha, R. Brian Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker (Canada, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Using GPT to Identify Changes in Clinical Trial Outcomes Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov
Xiangji Ying, Colby Vorland, Kiran Ninan, Jean-Pierre Oberste, Andrew Brown, Riaz Qureshi, Sirui Zhang, Nicholas DeVito, Matthew Page, Ian Saldanha, Halil Kilicoglu, Evan Mayo-Wilson (Australia, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Open Science, Availability of Protocols, and Registration
Perceived Risks and Barriers to Open Research Practices in UK Higher Education
Lukas Hughes-Noehrer, Noémie Aubert Bonn (United Kingdom)
Abstract
Use of an Open Science Checklist and Reproducibility of Findings: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ayu Putu Madri Dewi, Melissa Rethlefsen, Sara Schroter, Florian Naudet, Nicholas DeVito, Constant Vinatier, Inge Stegeman, Mariska Leeflang, Gowri Gopalakrishna (France, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Nonregistration, Discontinuation, and Nonpublication of Randomized Trials in Switzerland, the UK, Germany, and Canada: An Updated Meta-Research Study
Benjamin Speich, Ala Heravi, Johannes Schwenke, Christof Schönenberger, Lena Hausheer, Dmitry Gryaznov, Jason Busse, Manuela Covino, Szimonetta Lohner, Malena Chiaborelli, Ruben Ramirez, Ramon Saccilotto, Erik von Elm, Arnav Agarwal, Julian Hirt, David Mall, Alain Amstutz, Selina Epp, Dominik Mertz, Anette Blümle, Belinda von Niederhäusern, Ayodele Odutayo, Alexandra Griessbach, Sally Hopewell, Matthias Briel (Canada, Germany, Hungary, Switzerland, United Kingdom)
Abstract | Article published in JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(9):e2524440. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24440
Factors Associated With Improper Clinical Trial Registration, Registration Deficiencies, and Publication Status of Submissions to The BMJ
David Blanco, Elizabeth Loder, Sophie Cook, Sara Schroter (Spain, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Registered Clinical Trial Trends in East Asia and the United States, 2014 to 2025
Eunhye Lee, San Lee, Jae Il Shin, John Ioannidis (South Korea, United States)
Abstract
Open Science and Data Sharing
Researcher Adherence to Journal Data Sharing Policies: A Meta-Research Study
Aidan Tan, Yiyi Lin, Michellie Lian, Zhilin Ren, Tony Lian, Vincent Yuan, Angela Webster, Anna Seidler (Australia)
Abstract
A Funder-Led Intervention to Increase the Sharing of Data, Code, Protocols, and Key Laboratory Materials
Robert Thibault, Dana Cobb-Lewis, Matt Lewis, Devin Snyder, Cornelis Blauwendraat, Sonya Dumanis (United States)
Abstract
Medical Journal Policies on Requirements for Clinical Trial Registration, Reporting Guidelines, and Data Sharing: A Systematic Review
Kyobin Hwang, Zexing Song, Marsida Stafa, Jodie Chiu, An-Wen Chan (Canada)
Abstract
AI for Detecting Problems and Assessing Quality in Peer Review
Leveraging Large Language Models for Detecting Citation Quotation Errors in Biomedical Literature
M. Janina Sarol, Jodi Schneider, Halil Kilicoglu (United States)
Abstract
Automating the Detection of Promotional (Hype) Language in Biomedical Research
Bojan Batalo, Neil Millar, Erica Shimomoto (Japan)
Abstract
Evaluation of a Method to Detect Peer Reviews Generated by Large Language Models
Vishisht Rao, Aounon Kumar, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Nihar Shah (United States)
Abstract | Article published in arXiv:2503.15772v2 [cs.DL]. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.15772
Quality and Comprehensiveness of Peer Reviews of Journal Submissions Produced by Large Language Models vs Humans
Fares Alahdab, Juan Franco, Helen Macdonald, Sara Schroter (United States, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Back to Top
POSTERS
Poster Session Abstracts
All In-person Posters will be presented on Thursday, September 4, and Friday, September 5; Virtual Posters will be available to view Wednesday September 3 through Friday, September 5.
AI in Peer Review and Publication
In-person
Domain-Specific Pretrained Encoder Transformers for the Identification of Methodologically Rigorous Systematic Reviews: A Retrospective Modeling Study
Fangwen Zhou, Muhammad Afzal, Rick Parrish, Ashirbani Saha, Wael Abdelkader, R. Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker (Canada, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Strategic Insights Into Editor Engagement With AI-Assisted Tools Based on Survey and Data Analysis of AI-Assisted Ethics Checks
Beth Waymouth, Heather Slater, Angharad Goode, Katie Allin, Maria Kowalczuk (Switzerland, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Attitudes and Perceptions of Biomedical Journal Editors in Chief Toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scholarly Publishing Process
Jeremy Ng, Malvika Krishnamurthy, Gursimran Deol, Wid Al-Khafaji, Vetrivel Balaji, Magdalene Abebe, Jyot Adhvaryu, Tejas Karrthik, Pranavee Mohanakanthan, Adharva Vellaparambil, Lex Bouter, R. Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker, Hervé Maisonneuve, Ana Marušić, David Moher (Canada, Croatia, France, Germany, Netherlands)
Abstract | Article published in Res Integr Peer Rev 10, 19 (2025). doi:10.1186/s41073-025-00178-8
Attitudes and Perceptions Toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Medical Journal Peer Review: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional Survey
Jeremy Ng, Daivat Bhavsar, Neha Dhanvanthry, Lex Bouter, Teresa Chan, Holger Cramer, Annette Flanagin, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker, Hervé Maisonneuve, Ana Marušić, David Moher (Canada, Croatia, France, Germany, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract
Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS’24 Experiment
Alexander Goldberg, Ihsan Ullah, Thanh Gia Hieu Khuong, Benedictus Rachmat, Zhen Xu, Isabelle Guyon, Nihar Shah (France, United States)
Abstract
Accuracy and Precision of a Neural Network Author Name Disambiguator
Vicente Amado Olivo, Wolfgang Kerzendorf, Nutan Chen, Joshua Shields, Bangjing Lu, Andreas Flörs (Germany, United States)
Abstract
An AI-assisted Analysis of Published PeerJ Open Peer Reviews
Peiling Wang, Dietmar Wolfram, Scott Shumate (United States)
Abstract
Comparing Observational Exposure-Phenotype Correlations With Large Language Model Predictions
Chirag Patel, Arjun Manrai, Randall Ellis, John Ioannidis (United States)
Abstract
Pragmatic Assessment of Different AI Large Language Models for Extraction of CONSORT Items From Randomized Controlled Trials Before Peer Review
Nicola Di Girolamo, Reint Meursinge Reynders, Ugo Di Girolamo (Netherlands, United States)
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence Editorial Policies and Reporting Standards in Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Journals
Josh Major, Kurt Mahnken, Alec Young, Cameron O’Brien, Andrew Tran, Patrick Crotty, Alica Ford, Matt Vassar (United States)
Abstract
Enhancing Research Integrity in Abstract Submissions With a Hybrid AI-Human Post-Review Process
Heather Goodell, Chirag (Jay) Patel Jonathan Schultz, Christine Beaty, Shilpi Mehra (United Arab Emirates, United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Policies on Artificial Intelligence Among Academic Publishers
Jeremy Ng, Daivat Bhavsar, Laura Duffy, Hamin Jo, Cynthia Lokker, R.Brian Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Ana Marušić (Canada, Croatia, Germany)
Abstract
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools by Authors and Reviewers of the Journal Eurosurveillance
Eva Sarachaga, Ines Steffens (Sweden)
Abstract
Use of an AI Peer Review Panel to Assess Clarity, Novelty, and Impact
Pawin Taechoyotin, Daniel Acuna (United States)
Abstract
Reviewer Rating Variability and Confidence and Language Model Sentiment Prediction of Machine Learning Conference Papers
Yidan Sun, Mayank Kejriwal (United States)
Abstract
Authorship and Contributorship
In-person
Co–First Authors and Co–Corresponding Authors in the Chinese Medical Journal and JAMA
Ting Gao, Xiuyuan Hao (China)
Abstract
Authorship and Contributorship Criteria and Practices at the Annals of African Surgery
Cecilia Munguti, James Kiilu, James Kigera, Michael Mwachiro (Kenya)
Abstract
Integration of Credit and Accountability Principles in Authorship Policies of Science Journals and Research Institutions
Mohammad Hosseini, Sofie Adams, Yensi Flores, Kathleen Jamieson, Joerg Heber, Jennifer Heimberg, Veronique Kiermer, Arthur Lupia, Ana Marušić, Beau Nielsen, Magdalena Skipper, Geeta Swamy, Susan Wolf (Croatia, Ireland, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Authors Who Publish in a Journal and Likelihood to Serve as Reviewers
Stephan Fihn, Roy Perlis Jacob Kendall-Taylor, Annette Flanagin (United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Compiling the Publications Produced by Medical Writing
Maud Bernisson (France)
Abstract
Bias
In-person
Topic and Knowledge-Base Interdisciplinarity in Manuscripts Submitted to Physical Science Journals vs Editorial Decision and Reviewer Positivity
Sidney Xiang, Daniel Romero, Misha Teplitskiy (United States)
Abstract
The Influence of Promotional Language on Evaluations of Biomedical Literature: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Brian Budgell, Neil Millar (Canada, Japan)
Abstract
Unraveling the Spin and Selective Reporting in Medical AI Research: A Cross-Sectional Meta-Research Study
Vincent Yuan, Aidan Christopher Tan (Australia)
Abstract
A Comparison of Self-Acknowledged Limitations With Risk of Bias Assessments
Joe Menke, Mengfei Lan, Halil Kilicoglu (United States)
Abstract
Assessment of Spin Among Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analyses Published in Top Pathology Journals: A Systematic Review
Griffin Hughes, Andrew Tran, Sydney Marouk, Eli Paul, Matt Vassar (United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Study Hypotheses and Results From Superiority and Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trials
Yuanxi Jia, Yiwen Jiang, Karen Robinson, Jinling Tang (China, Singapore, United States)
Abstract
Biomedical Studies Published With Negative Results Over the Past Decade
Hannah Varkey, Florian Thomas, Elli Gourna Paleoudis (United States)
Abstract
Bibliometrics and Publication Metrics
In-person
Review and Publication Times Across Journals Publishing on Health Policy
Kathryn Phillips, Danea Horn (United States)
Abstract
Funding Sources and the Online and Academic Impact of Cardiovascular Trials Published in Highest-Impact Journals
Farbod Zahedi Tajrishi, Sina Rashedi, Ashkan Hashemi, Isaac Dreyfus, Nicholas Varunok, John Burton, Björn Redfors, Gregory Piazza, Joshua Wallach, Lesley Curtis, Sanjay Kaul, David Cohen, Roxana Mehran, Flavia Geraldes, Joseph Ross, Jane Leopold, Harlan Krumholz, Gregg Stone, Behnood Bikdeli (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Publication Trends on Priority Epidemics According to the Sustainable Development Goals in Pharmaceutical Journals, 2000-2024
Julia Soto Rizzato, Marcus Silva, David Moher, Tais Galvao (Brazil, Canada)
Abstract
Science Journal Abstracts Misregistered in the Crossref Database
Qinyue Liu, Yagmur Ozturk, Cyril Labbé (France)
Abstract
Trends in Citation Impacts of Original Research in Major Cardiovascular Journals, 2008-2018
Younwoo Ki, Chungsoo Kim, Yuan Lu, Joshua Wallach, Behnood Bikdeli, Milton Packer, Harlan Krumholz, Seng Chan You (South Korea, United States)
Abstract
Conflict of Interest
In-person
Psychiatry Editors in Chief Publishing Practices in Their Own Journals
Justin Nguyen, Robert Rubin (United States)
Abstract | Article published in Accountability in Research, 1–9. doi:10.1080/08989621.2025.2551166
Prevalence and Nature of Conflict of Interest Disclosures in Published Health Technology Assessment Reports
Miro Vukovic, Ana Marušić (Croatia)
Abstract
Development of a Tool for Addressing Conflicts of Interest in Trials (TACIT) for Use in Systematic Reviews
Andreas Lundh, Isabelle Boutron, Lesley Stewart, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson (Denmark, France, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Corporate Influence on Peer-Reviewed Research: Insights From BP’s Deepwater Horizon Response
Marc-André Gagnon, Blue Miaoran Dong (Canada)
Abstract
Conflicts of Interest in Research Across Scholarly Disciplines
Helena Van Beersel Krejcikova, Christoffer Korfitsen, Lisa Bero, Jason Dana, David Dorman, Quinn Grundy, Ibo van de Poel, Morten Rosenmeier, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Andreas Lundh (Canada, Denmark, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract
A Taxonomy-Based Guideline Framework for Conflict of Interest Disclosures (CoST)
Pritha Sarkar, Ruth Whittam, Leslie McIntosh (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Navigating the Challenges of Competing Interest Disclosures in Academic Publishing
Julia Gunn, Coromoto Power Febres, Laura Wilson (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Conflict of Interest Network Robustness and Funder Homogeneity Associated With Reported Adverse Events and Deaths in Published Drug Studies
S. Scott Graham, Joshua Barbour, Zoltan Majdik, Madeline Bruegger, Carlee Baker, Justin Rousseau (United States)
Abstract
Disclosed and Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest in US Guidelines for the Management of Obesity
Alessandro Bianconi, Matteo Fiore, Maria Flacco, Lamberto Manzoli (Italy)
Abstract
Data Sharing and Access
In-person
Data Availability Statements in Health Research in Articles and Journal Policies in Korea
Sue Kim, Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi (South Korea)
Abstract
Metrics of Primary and Secondary Publications of Clinical Trials With Data Shared on the YODA Project Platform
Erfan Taherifard, Hollin Hakimian, Maryam Mooghali, Sahil Mane, Mengyuan Fu, Stephen Bamford, Karla Childers, Nihar Desai, Cary Gross, Debbie Hewens, Harlan Krumholz, Richard Lehman, Jessica Ritchie, Tamsin Sargood, Joshua Wallach, Molly Willeford, Joseph Ross (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Data Sharing Statement Reporting Across Medical Specialties
Eli Paul, Griffin Hughes, Alex Hagood, Matt Vassar (United States)
Abstract
Diversity and Inclusion
In-person
Retraction Prevalence and Gender Imbalance Among Highly-Cited Authors and Among All Authors Across Scientific Disciplines
John Ioannidis, Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Antonio Cristiano, Guillaume Roberge, Stefania Boccia, Jeroen Baas (Canada, Italy, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract
Academic Institutional Affiliations and Gender of Authors, Editorial Board Members, and Editors of Journals
Ulrike Muller, Marie Schwaner, Ksenia Keplinger (Germany, United States)
Abstract
Diversity Among Reviewers Assigned to Evaluate a Paper as a Factor in Diversifying Perspective and Improving the Peer Review Process in Computer Science
Navita Goyal, Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar Shah, Hal Daumé III (Russia, United States)
Abstract
Geographical Representation of Author Country Among Peer Reviewers and Publishing Success at 60 STEM Journals
James Zumel Dumlao, Misha Teplitskiy (United States)
Abstract
Author Responses to Editorial Guidance on Reporting of Sex, Gender, Race and Ethnicity Data
Mabel Chew, Taissa Vila, Jashelle Caga-Meller, Zoe Mullan, Diana Samuel (Australia, Brazil, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Representation of Authors from Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) in Trials With Participants From LMICs
Harleen Marwah, Abarna Pearl, Christos Kotanidis, Sarah Gorey, Darren Taichman, Mary Beth Hamel (United States)
Abstract
Evolution of Authorship Diversity in African Surgical Research Over 2 Decades
Vincent Kipkorir, Godfrey Philipo, Mumba Chalwe-Kaja, Tihitena Negussie, Michael Mwachiro, Robert Parker, Seke Kazuma, Stella Itungu, Abebe Bekele (Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia)
Abstract
Virtual
Integrating Indigenous Knowledge Into Peer Review Processes in Nigerian Environmental and Health Research
Oludele Solaja (Nigeria)
Abstract
Geographical Disparities in Navigating Rejection in Scientific Publication
Hong Chen, Chris Rider, David Jurgens, Misha Teplitskiy (United States)
Abstract
Editorial Landscape of Journals in Kenya, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Mozambique
Patrick Amboka, Daniel Krugman, Tony Aloo (Kenya, United States)
Abstract
Editorial and Peer Review Processes
In-person
Effects of Peer Review and Editorial Workflows in Decision-Making at a Diamond Open Access Journal
Tais Galvao, Everton Silva, Jorge Barreto, Marcus Silva (Brazil)
Abstract
Reminding Peer Reviewers to Comment on Reporting Items as Instructed by the Journal: An Analysis of 2 Randomized Trials
Hillary Wnfried Ramirez, Malena Chiaborelli, Christof Schönenberger, Katie Mellor, Alexandra Griessbach, Paula Dhiman, Pooja Gandhi, Szimonetta Lohner, Arnav Agarwal, Ayodele Odutayo, Michael Schlussel, Philippe Ravaud, David Moher, Matthias Briel, Isabelle Boutron, Sally Hopewell, Sara Schroter, Benjamin Speich (Canada, France, Hungary, Switzerland, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Differences Between Manuscripts Versions: A Living Review and Series of Meta-Analyses
Mario Malički, Ana Jerončić, Gerben Ter Riet, Lex Bouter, John Ioannidis, IJsbrand Aalbersberg, Steven Goodman (Croatia, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract
Quality of Patient Reviewer Comments and Association With Author and Editor Responses
Melecia Miller, Vera Nezgovorova, Ilana Kersch, Mohamed Elsaid, Marina Broitman (United States)
Abstract
Factors Associated With Outcomes of Appeals of Manuscripts Initially Rejected by a General Medical Journal
Matthew Stanbrook, Shannon Charlebois, George Tomlinson, Meredith Weinhold (Canada)
Abstract
Automated Targeted Emails for Improving Author Compliance With Study Reporting Requirements and Other Editorial Processes
Daniel Evanko, Deondre Jordan (United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Trends in Peer Review Metrics at the Annals of African Surgery
James Kiilu, Cecilia Munguti, James Kigera, Michael Mwachiro (Kenya)
Abstract
Impact of a Novel Checklist on the Peer Review Process
Jorge Finke, Sumi Sexton (United States)
Abstract
Identifying Methodological Concerns in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-Based Practice Center Reports: Analysis of Editorial Review Comments
Haley Holmer, Edi Kuhn, Camber Hansen-Karr, Ed Reid, Mark Helfand (United States)
Abstract
Education/Training
In-person
Peer Review Exercises to Enhance Trainees’ Readiness to Confront Unfair or Biased Reviews
Franki Kung, Mariam Aly, Shahana Ansari, Eliana Colunga, M. J. Crockett, Amanda Diekman, Pablo Gomez, Paul McKee, Miriam Pérez, Sarah Stilwell, Matthew Goldrick (United States)
Abstract
Virtual
A Pilot Program for Early Career Mentorship in Journal Peer-Review
Anjali Garg, Preeti Panda, Lydia Furman, Kimberly Montez, Alex Kemper, Lewis First (United States)
Abstract
In-Person Peer Review Training to Improve Preparedness to Evaluate Manuscripts
Marcus Silva, Tais Galvao (Brazil)
Abstract
Quality of an Educational Program to Empower Early Career Faculty and Trainees Through Mentored Training in Peer Review
Susan Galandiuk, Vaitheesh Jaganathan, Hillary Simon (United States)
Abstract
Errors and Corrections
In-person
Quotation Inaccuracy in Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Christopher Baethge, Hannah Jergas (Germany)
Abstract
Virtual
Taiwanese Researchers’ Perceptions of Errors and Their Coping Strategies
Chien Chou (Taiwan)
Abstract
Funding/Grant Peer Review
In-person
Multistakeholder Perspectives on Current Attitudes Toward Unmasking Reviewers’ Identity in Biomedical Research Proposals’ Peer Review: A Qualitative Study
Seba Qussini, Farizah Anami, Kris Dierickx (Belgium, Qatar)
Abstract
Influence of Using a Systematic Review to Justify New Research on Funding Application Score
Jong-Wook Ban, Hans Lund, Karen Robinson, Ida Svege, Jan-Ole Hesselberg (Norway, United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Construction and Validation of Instruments for the Peer Review of Grant Proposals in Peru
Max Carlos Ramírez-Soto, Laura Alvarado-Barbarán, Dianeth Rojas-Naccha, Ayda Luna-Mercado, Arlet Arce-Zavala (Peru)
Abstract
Reviewers’ Interpretation and Application of Research Quality Criteria in Grant Peer Review
Rachel Claus (Canada)
Abstract
Experiences and Challenges Faced by Canadian Health Research Grant Peer Reviewers
Joanie Sims Gould, Anne Lasinsky, Adrian Mota, Karim Khan, Clare Ardern (Canada)
Abstract
Misconduct and Research Integrity
In-person
Experience With 12 Years of Plagiarism and Duplication Screening
Markus Heinemann, Andreas Boening, Kazunori Okabe, Jessica Bogensberger (Japan, Germany)
Abstract
Vulnerability of Automated Text-Matching-Based Reviewer Assignments to Collusions
Jhih-Yi Hsieh, Aditi Raghunathan, Nihar Shah (United States)
Abstract | Article published in Proceedings of the 34th USENIX Security Symposium. August 13–15, 2025, Seattle, WA, USA. 978-1-939133-52-6
Identifying Potential Duplicate Publications in the Scientific Literature Using Crossref
Cyril Labbé, Qinyue Liu, Amira Barhoumi, Olessya Miroshnichenko (France)
Abstract
Tortured Phrases as a Sign of Possible Misconduct in Proceedings From an Engineering Conference
Wendeline Swart, Ophélie Fraisier-Vannier, Guillaume Cabanac (France)
Abstract
Virtual
Plagiarism and Publication Frauds Revealed by Dissernet
Larisa Melikhova, Andrey Rostovtsev, Vasiliy Vlassov (Israel, Russia)
Abstract
Citation Biases and Citation-Boosting Strategies: A Scoping Review of Predictors
Hans Lund, Karen Robinson, Jong-Wook Ban, Karen Lie, Birgitte Nørgaard (Denmark, Norway, United States)
Abstract
Open and Public Access
Virtual
Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Open Access Publishing in Dermatology Journals
Dante Dahabreh, Kenny Thien Long Ta, Angela Loczi-Storm, Olivia Lim, Dana Chen, Tasneem IS, Alexandria Kristensen-Cabrera, Rahib Islam, Robert Dellavalle, Eamonn Maher (United States)
Abstract
Public Access to Information Cited in Rare Disease Reports
Mengyuan Fu, Kexin Ling, Xinyi Zhou, Sneha Dave, Can Li, Luwen Shi, Xiaodong Guan, Joseph Ross (China, United States)
Abstract
Open Science
In-person
Citations of Articles With Open Science Indicators in the French Open Science Monitor Dataset
Giovanni Colavizza, Lauren Cadwallader, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz (Italy, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Automated Interpretation of Statistical Tables to Assess Reporting Errors and Associations With Open Science Policies in Economics Journals
Stephan Bruns, Helmut Herwartz, John Ioannidis, Chris Islam, Fabian Raters (Belgium, Germany, United States)
Abstract
Detection of Open Science Practices in Major Medical Journals: A Survey and Diagnostic Accuracy of Automatic Tools Using Sensitivity and Specificity
Constant Vinatier, Ayu Putu Madri Dewi, Gwénaël Dumont, Tracey Weissgerber, Vladislav Nachev, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Maud Scheidecker, François-Joseph Arnault, Nicholas DeVito, Guillaume Freyermuth, Mathieu Acher, Gauthier Le Bartz Lyan, Inge Stegeman, Mariska Leeflang, Florian Naudet (France, Germany, Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Pandemic Science
In-person
Analysis of Editorials on the Response to the H1N1 and COVID-19 Pandemics
Luka Ursic, Nensi Bralić, Giovanni Spitale, Federico Germani, Ana Marušić (Croatia, Switzerland)
Abstract
Consistency and Completeness of Retractions in Public Health Research on COVID-19
Caitlin Bakker, Erin Reardon, Sarah Brown, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Sara Schroter, Lex Bouter, Maurice Zeegers (Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Paper Mills
In-person
Analysis of Cancer Research Discussion Text and References in High-Impact Factor Journals for Possible Indicators of Paper Mills
Annie Whamond, Adrian Barnett, Jennifer Byrne (Australia)
Abstract
Screening Articles for Tortured Phrases With a Regular Expressions–Based Detector
Alexandre Clausse, Guillaume Cabanac, Pascal Cuxac, Cyril Labbé (France)
Abstract
Peer Review
In-person
Librarian and Information Specialist Perceptions of Peer Reviewing Systematic Reviews
Melissa Rethlefsen, Carrie Price, Sara Schroter (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
An Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Evaluating Interventions to Optimize Peer Review
Francesco De Pretis, Abdelghani Maddi, Ahmad Yaman Abdin (France, Germany, United States)
Abstract
Evidence of Use of Template-Based Peer-Review Reports and Concern About Review Mills
Cyril Labbé, Gilles Hubert, Wendeline Swart, Guillaume Cabanac (France)
Abstract
Virtual
Research Culture Influences in Peer Review: A Targeted Thematic Analysis of Current Challenges in Peer Review
Lesley Uttley, Yuliang Weng, Louise Falzon (United Kingdom)
Abstract
Motivations to Participate in the Peer Review Process at the Journal of Urology
Anne Dudley, George Koch, Kyle Rose, Roei Golan, Jennifer Regala, Casey Seideman, Amanda North, Kevin Koo, Kevan Sternberg, Gina Badalato, Benjamin Dropkin, Nicholas Chakiryan, Robert Siemens, Peter Clark, Andrew Harris (Canada, United States)
Abstract
Review of Proposals Submitted to Elsevier’s Peer Review Workbench
Bahar Mehmani, Silvia Dobre, Ramadurai Petchiappan (Netherlands)
Abstract
Peer Review Process and Models
In-person
Efficiency of Author Anonymization in Peer Review
Markus Heinemann, Andreas Boening, Kazunori Okabe, Jessica Bogensberger, Zulfugar Taghiyev (Germany, Japan)
Abstract
Manuscript Submissions Following Implementation of Guaranteed Peer Review
Yurong Fei Bloom, Matthew Welch (United States)
Abstract
Editor Initial Manuscript Review: A Masked Pilot Study
Douglas Novins, Mary Billingsley, Robert Althoff (United States)
Abstract
Optimizing Proposal Assignments in the Distributed Peer Review System of the World’s Largest Radio Telescope Observatory
Andrea Corvillon, John Carpenter, Nihar Shah (Chile, United States)
Abstract
AI-Augmented Peer Review, Collaboration Dynamics, and Human Reviewer Performance
Ashia Livaudais, Dmitri Iourovitski (United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Use of a 3-Round Modified Delphi Format to Support Robust, Rapid Peer Review
Sean Hays Tyler Carneal, Christopher Kirman (United States)
Abstract
Predatory Journals
In-person
Persistence and Indexing of Predatory Journals and Publishers: A Follow-Up Evaluation of Beall’s List
Pravin Bolshete, Madhulika Bolshete, Priyanka Mate (India)
Abstract
Virtual
Inclusion of Randomized Controlled Trials Published by Potentially Predatory Journals in Anesthesiology Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Study
Julián Velásquez Paz, Andrés Zorrilla Vaca, Markus Klimek, Jose Calvache (Colombia, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract
Preprints
In-person
Preprint Policies in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Journals
Marija Purgar, Edward Ivimey-Cook, Antica Culina, Joshua Wallach (Croatia, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Authors’ Journeys From Preprints With The Lancet on SSRN to Publication
Sherrie Kelly, Clare Stone, Catherine Fiscus, Ashlie Jackman-Juler, Miriam Lewis Sabin (Canada, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Preregistration of Studies
In-person
Impact of ICMJE Trial Registration Policy at 20 Years
Julianne Nelson, Tony Tse, Swapna Mohan, Yvonne Puplampu-Dove (United States)
Abstract
Effectiveness of Preregistration in Psychology
Olmo Van den Akker, Marcel Van Assen, Marjan Bakker, Jelte Wicherts (Netherlands)
Abstract
Registration of Observational Studies of Interventions: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Journal Policies
Cecilie Jespersen, Zexing Song, An-Wen Chan, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson (Canada, Denmark)
Abstract
International Registered Reports Identifiers (IRRIDs): 7 Years of Experiences
Gunther Eysenbach (Canada)
Abstract
Virtual
Outcome Switching in Observational Studies of Interventions: Comparison of Registration Records and Published Articles
Zexing Song, Cecilie Jespersen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, S. Joseph Kim, Rob Fowler, Peter Austin, An-Wen Chan (Canada, Denmark)
Abstract
Quality of Reporting
In-person
Assessing the Quality and Timeliness of Results Reporting for Clinical Trials on Antimicrobial Agents
Megan Curtin, Allisun Wiltshire, Brix Kowalski, Maximilian Siebert (United States)
Abstract
Reporting Study Design in Korean Medical Journal Articles
Soo Young Kim, Sue Kim, Hyun Jung Yi (South Korea)
Abstract
Comparative Analysis of Expert, Clinician, and Consumer Interactions With Summary of Findings Tables: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Nina Vitlov, Nensi Bralić, Tina Poklepović-Peričić, Daniel Garcia-Costa, Emilia Lopez-Iñesta, Elena Álvarez-García, Francisco Grimaldo, Ana Marušić (Croatia, Spain)
Abstract
Replication and Impact of Positive Secondary Findings in Negative or Neutral Cardiovascular Trials
Sina Rashedi, Farbod Zahedi Tajrishi, Ashkan Hashemi, Isaac Dreyfus, Nicholas Varunok, John Burton, Seng Chan You, Bjorn Redfors, Gregory Piazza, Joshua Wallach, Lesley Curtis, Sanjay Kaul, David Cohen, Roxana Mehran, Mitchell Elkind, Flavia Geraldes, Joseph Ross, Jane Leopold, Harlan Krumholz, Gregg Stone, Behnood Bikdeli (South Korea, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Public Availability of Randomized Clinical Trial Protocols: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study
Christof Schönenberger, Malena Chiaborelli, Ala Heravi, Lukas Kübler, Pooja Gandhi, Zsuzsanna Kontar, Julia Hüllstrung, Mona Elalfy, Jan Glasstetter, Dmitry Gryaznov, Belinda von Niederhäusern, Anette Blümle, Jason Busse, Szimonetta Lohner, Sally Hopewell, Matthias Briel, Benjamin Speich (Canada, Germany, Hungary, Switzerland, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Adherence to the WHO Statement on Public Disclosure of Clinical Trial Results by Trials Published in High Impact Factor Journals
Carolina Grana, Lina Ghosn, Carolina Riveros, Philippe Ravaud, Isabelle Boutron (France)
Abstract
Prevalence of Prospective Registration and Primary Outcome Discrepancies in Recently Published Randomized Controlled Trials
Ioana Alina Cristea, Florian Naudet, Guillaume Cabanac, John Ioannidis (France, Italy, United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Developing a Harmonized Approach for Reporting Irradiation Protocols and Methods for Research Using X-ray Irradiators
Warren Stern, Ioanna Iliopulos, Christopher Boyd, Sidra Zia (United States)
Abstract
Reporting Guidelines
In-person
Challenges in Achieving Uptake and Journal Endorsement of the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) Guideline
Christopher Winchester, Mark Rolfe, William Gattrell, Patricia Logullo, Kieth Goldman, Amy Price, Paul Blazey, Esther van Zuuren, Niall Harrison (Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Transparent Reporting of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial: The TARGET Guideline
Aidan Cashin, Harrison Hansford, Miguel Hernán, Sonja Swanson, Hopin Lee, Matthew Jones, Issa Dahabreh, Barbra Dickerman, Matthias Egger, Xabier Garcia-Albeniz, Robert Golub, Nazrul Islam, Sara Lodi, Margarita Moreno-Betancur, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Melissa Sharp, Jonathan Sterne, Elizabeth Stuart, James McAuley (Australia, Ireland, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract | Article published in JAMA. 2025;334(12):1084–1093. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13350
Author Practices and Experiences With PRISMA-P 2015
Mette B. Engmose, An-Wen Chan, Kerry Dwan, Carsten Hinrichsen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Lesley Stewart, Camilla Nejstgaard (Canada, Denmark, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Development of a Reporting Guideline on Health Equity in Observational Research (STROBE-Equity)
Vivian Welch, Catherine Chamberlain, Peter Craig, Luis Gabriel Cuervo, Omar Dewidar, Holly Ellingwood, Elizabeth Ghogomu, Billie Jo Hardy, Tanya Horsley, Sonya Faber, Condy Feng, Damian Francis, Sarah Funnell, Alison Krentel, Janet Jull, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Julian Little, Lovelin Lum Niba, Tamara Kredo, Zack Marshall, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Michael Mahande, Stuart Nicholls, Miriam Nkangu Nguilefem, Ekwaro Obuku, Oyekola Oloyede, Ebenezer Owusu-Addo, Kevin Pottie, Jacqueline Ramke, Alison Riddle, Anita Rizvi, Janet Hatcher Roberts, Larissa Shamseer, Melissa Sharp, Janice Tufte, Peter Tugwell, Xiaoqin Wang, Laura Weeks, Charles Wisonge, Luke Wolfenden, Taryn Young (Australia, Cameroon, Canada, Ghana, Ireland, Kenya, New Zealand, South Africa, Uganda, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract | Article published in JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(9):e2532512. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.32512
Reproducibility
In-person
Factors Associated With the Reproducibility of Health Sciences Research: A Systematic Review and Evidence Gap Map
Stephana Julia Moss, Juliane Kennett, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Niklas Bobrovitz, Henry T. Stelfox (Canada)
Abstract
Perception of Open Science Practices on Reproducibility Among Reviewers of Grant Proposals at Research Funding Organizations
Ayu Putu Madri Dewi, Nicholas J. DeVito, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Inge Stegeman, Mariska Leeflang (Netherlands, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Virtual
Testing Computational Reproducibility Review in Editorial Workflows of Academic Journals: A Randomized Controlled Trial From the European iRISE project
Laura Caquelin, Rachel Heyard, Stephanie Zellers, Hanno Würbel, Gustav Nilsonne (Finland, Sweden, Switzerland)
Abstract
Prevalence of Reproducible Health Sciences Research: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Niklas Bobrovitz, Harriet Ware, Corson Johnstone, Juliane Kennett, Stephana Moss, Liam Whalen-Browne, Faizan Khan, Benjamin Fletcher, Daniel Niven, Henry Stelfox (Canada)
Abstract
Research Methods
In-person
Characterizing Adverse Event Methods Reported in ClinicalTrials.gov and Publications
Kyungwan Hong, Mark Basista, Tony Tse (United States)
Abstract
Bias in Machine Learning Associated With Weak Baselines, Data Leakage, and Inadequate Measures Reporting
Randall Ellis, Chirag J. Patel (United States)
Abstract
Individual-Participant Data Meta-Analysis Methodological Guidance: A Systematic Review
Edith Otalike, Michael Clarke, Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala, Joel Gagnier (Canada, Northern Ireland)
Abstract
Reporting of Confounder Selection in Observational Studies in High Impact Medical and Epidemiological Journals, 2003-2023
Luis Correia, Rafael Mascarenhas, Felipe de Menezes, Jeronimo Oliveira Júnior, Marcus Almeida, Caio Azevedo, Naieli de Andrade, Viola Vaccarino, Joseph Ross, Joshua Wallach (Brazil, United States)
Abstract
Non-Inferiority vs Superiority Trials in Cardiovascular Research: Trends, Success in Meeting the Primary Outcome, and Online Engagement
Ashkan Hashemi, Isaac Dreyfus, Nicholas Varunok, John Burton, Sina Rashedi, Farbod Zahedi Tajrishi, Behnood Bikdeli (United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Estimation of an Upper Limit on the Maximum Effect That Can Be Detected in Randomized Trials of Cancer Therapeutics
Benjamin Djulbegovic, Iztok Hozo, Renata Iskander, Austin Parish, Jonathan Kimmelman, John Ioannidis (Canada, United States)
Abstract
Performance and Practicality of a Randomized Clinical Trial Classifier in Systematic Literature Reviews vs a Traditional Approach
Ambar Khan, Ania Bobrowska, Chloe Coelho, Hannah Frost, Swati Kumar, Hannah Russell, Anna Noel-Storr, Molly Murton (United Kingdom)
Abstract
Retractions
In-person
An Audit and Feedback Intervention to Reduce Inappropriate Citation of Retracted Literature in the Pain and Anesthesiology Fields
Michael Ferraro, Aidan Cashin, Amanda Williams, Emma Fisher, Gavin Stewart, Christopher Eccleston, Neil O’Connell (Australia, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Prevalence of and Reasons for Retractions of Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Publications by Authors From Mainland China in International Peer-Reviewed Journals
Jing Cui, Nan Yang, Kexin Ji, Dingran Yin, Chen Shen, Zhaolan Liu, Han Tan, Yaxin Sun, Zhaoqi Huo, Shuo Liu, Huiyu Wang, Xintong Zhang, Jing Guo, Yufei Wang, Xiaoqi Ren, Vincent Chung, Jianping Liu (China, Hong Kong)
Abstract
Citation Context Analysis of Retracted Articles: Leveraging Retraction Reasons to Track Unreliability in Citing Literature
Yagmur Ozturk, Frédérique Bordignon, Cyril Labbé, François Portet (France)
Abstract
Evaluating Approaches for Identifying Retracted Articles and Retraction Notices in Systematic Review Searching
Caitlin Bakker, Erin Reardon, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Sara Schroter, Lex Bouter, Maurice Zeegers (Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
Postretraction References in Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Kathryn Weber-Boer, Guillaume Cabanac (France, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Retracted Publications Referenced in Clinical Guidelines
Kathryn Weber-Boer, Guillaume Cabanac, Lonni Besançon (France, Sweden, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Retraction of Systematic Reviews and Clinical Practice Guidelines
Ivan D. Florez, Alberto Henriquez, Andres Estupinan-Bohorquez (Colombia)
Abstract
Social Media
In-person
Video and Social Media Performance at a Surgical Journal with Video Journal Clubs
Caden Seraphine, Abigail Chambers, Susan Galandiuk (United States)
Abstract
Virtual
Altmetric Footprint of Retracted and Corrected Publications: The Role of Misinformation and Disinformation
Ashraf Maleki, Niina Sormanen, Kim Holmberg (Finland)
Abstract
Back to Top
Speakers
