10th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication
September 3-5, 2025

Download printable PDF version of Final Program and Abstracts
 
 

PROGRAM

 

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3

Welcome

 

The Drummond Rennie Lecture

Forward to the Past—Making Contributors Accountable

Ana Marušić (Croatia)
Abstract
 

Author and Reviewer Use of AI

Authors Self-disclosed Use of Artificial Intelligence in Research: Submissions to 49 BMJ Group Biomedical Journals

Isamme AlFayyad, Maurice Zeegers, Lex Bouter, Helen Macdonald, Sara Schroter (Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Artificial Intelligence Use and Acknowledgment in Medical Research Writing Among Chinese Scholars

Yang Zhang, Mengyuan Duan, Guoguang Zhao, Penghu Wei, Xiuyuan Hao (China)
Abstract

Factors Associated With Author and Reviewer Declared Use of AI in Medical Journals

Roy Perlis, Annette Flanagin, Michael Berkwits, Jacob Kendall-Taylor, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo (United States)
Abstract

Quantifying and Assessing the Use of Generative AI by Authors and Reviewers in the Cancer Research Field

Daniel Evanko, Michael Di Natale (United States)
Abstract
 

Authorship and Integrity Issues

Comparison of Reasons for Retraction of Biomedical Articles by Women and Men Authors

Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes, Carinna Hockham, Mark Woodward (United Kingdom)
Abstract

Paper Mill Use of Fake Personas to Manipulate the Peer Review Process

Tim Kersjes (Netherlands)
Abstract

Authorship Changes as an Indicator of Research Integrity Concerns in Submissions to Academic Journals

Coromoto Power Febres, Julia Gunn, Laura Wilson (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Notifying Authors That They Have Cited a Retracted Article and Future Citations of Retracted Articles: The RetractoBot Randomized Controlled Trial

Nicholas DeVito, Christine Cunningham, Ben Goldacre (United Kingdom)
Abstract

How a Questionable Research Network Manipulated Scholarly Publishing

Leslie McIntosh, Hélène Draux, Elizabeth Smee, Cynthia Hudson Vitale (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
 

Diversity and Research Environment

An Analysis of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Concerns From JAMA Network Peer Reviewers

Michael Mensah, Anand Habib, Jacob Kendall-Taylor, Mya Roberson, Kanade Shinkai, Annette Flanagin, Preeti Malani (United States)
Abstract

Assessment of an Intervention to Equalize the Proportion of Funded Grant Applications for Underrepresented Groups at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Anne Lasinsky, James Wrightson, Matthew Hogel, Alannah Brown, Adrian Mota, Karim Khan, Clare Ardern (Canada)
Abstract

Extracting Research Environment Indicators From the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021 Statements

Noémie Aubert Bonn, Lukas Hughes-Noehrer (United Kingdom)
Abstract
 

Research Misconduct and Integrity

Characterizing Problematic Images in Retracted Scientific Articles

João Phillipe Cardenuto, Daniel Moreira, Anderson Rocha (Brazil, United States)
Abstract

Misidentification of Scanning Electron Microscope Instruments in the Peer-Reviewed Materials Science and Engineering Literature

Reese Richardson, Jeonghyun Moon, Spencer Hong, Luís Amaral (United States)
Abstract

Retractions and Democracy Index Scores Across 167 countries

Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi, Hesam Salmabadi (Canada)
Abstract

Indicators of Small-Scale and Large-Scale Citation Concentration Patterns

Iakovos Evdaimon, John Ioannidis, Giannis Nikolentzos, Michail Chatzianastasis, George Panagopoulos, Michalis Vazirgiannis (France, Greece, Luxembourg, United States)
Abstract

Scale and Resilience in Organizations Enabling Systematic Scientific Fraud

Reese Richardson, Spencer Hong, Jennifer Byrne, Thomas Stoeger, Luís Amaral (Australia, United States)
Abstract | Article published in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (32) e2420092122, doi:10.1073/pnas.2420092122 (2025)

Patterns of Paper Mill Papers and Retraction Challenges

Anna Abalkina, Svetlana Kleiner (Germany, Netherlands)
Abstract

Sustainable Approaches to Upholding High Integrity Standards in the Face of Large-Scale Threats: Insights From PLOS One

Renee Hoch, Emily Chenette (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
 

Back to Top

Thursday, September 4

 
Morning Welcome and Housekeeping
 

The Douglas G. Altman Lecture

Does the Journal Article Have a Future?

Malcolm MacLeod (Scotland)
Abstract
 

Bias, Study Outcomes, and Reporting Concerns

Immortal Time Bias Prevalence and Influence on Estimates in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Jae Il Shin, Minseo Kim, Dong Keon Yon, Seung Won Lee, Masoud Rahmati, Marco Solmi, André Carvalho, Ai Koyanagi, Lee Smith, John Ioannidis (Australia, Canada, Iran, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Effect Estimates for the Same Outcomes Designated as Primary vs Secondary in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Meta-Research Study

Yiwen Jiang, Yuanxi Jia, Karen Robinson, Jinling Tang (China, Singapore, United States)
Abstract

Detection and Monitoring of Outcome Reporting Changes Using a Large Language Model: Application to FDA-Regulated Drug Trials

Ian Bulovic, Susmitha Wunnava, Wonjin Yoon, Adam Dunn, Timothy Miller, Florence Bourgeois (Australia, United States)
Abstract

Data Repurpose in AI Studies and Scientific Outcomes

Yulin Yu, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Daniel Romero (United States)
Abstract

Prevalence of the Statement “to Our Knowledge” and Similar Paraphrases in Current and Past Biomedical Literature

Nicola Di Girolamo, Reint Meursinge Reynders, Ugo Di Girolamo (Netherlands, United States)
Abstract
 

Peer Review Models

Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Assessments

Alexander Goldberg, Ivan Stelmakh, Kyunghyun Cho, Alice Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, Nihar Shah (Russia, South Korea, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Charvi Rastogi, Xiangchen Song, Zhijing Jin, Ivan Stelmakh, Hal Daume, Kun Zhang, Nihar Shah (Russia, United States)
Abstract | Article published in PLoS ONE 19(12): e0315674. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315674

Dual Anonymous and Distributed Peer Review for Proposal Review Rankings at the ALMA Observatory

John Carpenter, Andrea Corvillon (Chile)
Abstract

Comparison of Content in Published and Unpublished Peer Review Reports

Elena Álvarez- García, Daniel Garcia-Costa, Flaminio Squazzoni, Mario Malički, Bahar Mehmani, Francisco Grimaldo (Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United States)
Abstract
 

Editorial and Publishing Processes and Models

Changes to Research Article Abstracts Between Submission and Publication

Christos Kotanidis, Sarah Gorey, Harleen Marwah, Abarna Pearl, Darren Taichman, Mary Beth Hamel (United States)
Abstract | Article published in Ann Intern Med. [Epub 2 September 2025]. doi:10.7326/ANNALS-25-02250

Manuscript Characteristics Associated With Editorial Review and Peer Review Outcomes at Science and Science Advances

Nicholas LaBerge, Sam Zhang, Daniel Larremore, Aaron Clauset (United States)
Abstract

Investigating Changes in Common Vocabulary Terms in eLife Assessments Across Versions in a Publish, Review, Curate Model

Nicola Adamson, Andy Collings (United Kingdom)
Abstract
 

Peer Review Times and Payment Incentives

Results of Testing the Gold Standard 2-Week Reviewer Deadline

Emilie Gunn, Kelly Brooks, Stephanie Valladao (United States)
Abstract

Analysis of Decisions and Lead-Time in Ethical Review Boards in Sweden

Emmanuel Zavalis, Love Ahnström, Natasha Ohlsson, Gustave Nilsonne (Sweden)
Abstract

Monetary Incentives for Peer Review at a Medical Journal: A Quasi-Randomized Experimental Study

Christopher Cotton, Abid Alam, Sophie Tosta, Timothy Buchman, David Maslove (Canada, United States)
Abstract | Article published in Critical Care Medicine. 53(9):p e1836-e1837, September 2025. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006701

Exploring Views on Remuneration for Review: A Survey of BMJ’s Patient and Public Reviewers

Sara Schroter, Rebecca Harmstron, Emma Doble, Sophie Cook, Amy Price (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
 
Journal Prestige Can and Should Be Earned
Simine Vazire (Australia)
Abstract

Back to Top

Friday, September 5

 
Morning Welcome and Housekeeping

A Singular Disruption of Scientific Publishing—AI Proliferation and Blurred Responsibilities of Authors, Reviewers, and Editors

Zak Kohane (US)
Abstract
 

Use of AI to Assess Quality and Reporting

Natural Language Processing to Assess the Role of Preprints in COVID-19 Policy Guidance

Nicholas Evans, Samuel Angelli-Nichols, Emma Chang-Rabley, Yara Omar, Rachel Nas, Mikaela Finnegan, Rocco Casagrande, Emily Ricotta (United States)
Abstract

Leveraging Large Language Models for Assessing the Adherence of Randomized Controlled Trial Publications to Reporting Guidelines

Lan Jiang, Xiangji Ying, Mengfei Lan, Andrew Brown, Colby Vorland, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Halil Kilicoglu (United States)
Abstract

Understanding How a Language Model Assesses the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: Applying SHapley Additive exPlanations to Encoder Transformer Classification Models

Fangwen Zhou, Muhammad Afzal, Rick Parrish, Ashirbani Saha, R. Brian Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker (Canada, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Using GPT to Identify Changes in Clinical Trial Outcomes Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov

Xiangji Ying, Colby Vorland, Kiran Ninan, Jean-Pierre Oberste, Andrew Brown, Riaz Qureshi, Sirui Zhang, Nicholas DeVito, Matthew Page, Ian Saldanha, Halil Kilicoglu, Evan Mayo-Wilson (Australia, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
 

Open Science, Availability of Protocols, and Registration

Perceived Risks and Barriers to Open Research Practices in UK Higher Education

Lukas Hughes-Noehrer, Noémie Aubert Bonn (United Kingdom)
Abstract

Use of an Open Science Checklist and Reproducibility of Findings: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ayu Putu Madri Dewi, Melissa Rethlefsen, Sara Schroter, Florian Naudet, Nicholas DeVito, Constant Vinatier, Inge Stegeman, Mariska Leeflang, Gowri Gopalakrishna (France, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Nonregistration, Discontinuation, and Nonpublication of Randomized Trials in Switzerland, the UK, Germany, and Canada: An Updated Meta-Research Study

Benjamin Speich, Ala Heravi, Johannes Schwenke, Christof Schönenberger, Lena Hausheer, Dmitry Gryaznov, Jason Busse, Manuela Covino, Szimonetta Lohner, Malena Chiaborelli, Ruben Ramirez, Ramon Saccilotto, Erik von Elm, Arnav Agarwal, Julian Hirt, David Mall, Alain Amstutz, Selina Epp, Dominik Mertz, Anette Blümle, Belinda von Niederhäusern, Ayodele Odutayo, Alexandra Griessbach, Sally Hopewell, Matthias Briel (Canada, Germany, Hungary, Switzerland, United Kingdom)
Abstract | Article published in JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(9):e2524440. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24440

Factors Associated With Improper Clinical Trial Registration, Registration Deficiencies, and Publication Status of Submissions to The BMJ

David Blanco, Elizabeth Loder, Sophie Cook, Sara Schroter (Spain, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Registered Clinical Trial Trends in East Asia and the United States, 2014 to 2025

Eunhye Lee, San Lee, Jae Il Shin, John Ioannidis (South Korea, United States)
Abstract
 

Open Science and Data Sharing

Researcher Adherence to Journal Data Sharing Policies: A Meta-Research Study

Aidan Tan, Yiyi Lin, Michellie Lian, Zhilin Ren, Tony Lian, Vincent Yuan, Angela Webster, Anna Seidler (Australia)
Abstract

A Funder-Led Intervention to Increase the Sharing of Data, Code, Protocols, and Key Laboratory Materials

Robert Thibault, Dana Cobb-Lewis, Matt Lewis, Devin Snyder, Cornelis Blauwendraat, Sonya Dumanis (United States)
Abstract

Medical Journal Policies on Requirements for Clinical Trial Registration, Reporting Guidelines, and Data Sharing: A Systematic Review

Kyobin Hwang, Zexing Song, Marsida Stafa, Jodie Chiu, An-Wen Chan (Canada)
Abstract
 

AI for Detecting Problems and Assessing Quality in Peer Review

Leveraging Large Language Models for Detecting Citation Quotation Errors in Biomedical Literature

M. Janina Sarol, Jodi Schneider, Halil Kilicoglu (United States)
Abstract

Automating the Detection of Promotional (Hype) Language in Biomedical Research

Bojan Batalo, Neil Millar, Erica Shimomoto (Japan)
Abstract

Evaluation of a Method to Detect Peer Reviews Generated by Large Language Models

Vishisht Rao, Aounon Kumar, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Nihar Shah (United States)
Abstract | Article published in arXiv:2503.15772v2 [cs.DL]. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.15772

Quality and Comprehensiveness of Peer Reviews of Journal Submissions Produced by Large Language Models vs Humans

Fares Alahdab, Juan Franco, Helen Macdonald, Sara Schroter (United States, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Back to Top

POSTERS

 

Poster Session Abstracts

All In-person Posters will be presented on Thursday, September 4, and Friday, September 5; Virtual Posters will be available to view Wednesday September 3 through Friday, September 5.
 

AI in Peer Review and Publication

In-person
Domain-Specific Pretrained Encoder Transformers for the Identification of Methodologically Rigorous Systematic Reviews: A Retrospective Modeling Study

Fangwen Zhou, Muhammad Afzal, Rick Parrish, Ashirbani Saha, Wael Abdelkader, R. Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker (Canada, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Strategic Insights Into Editor Engagement With AI-Assisted Tools Based on Survey and Data Analysis of AI-Assisted Ethics Checks

Beth Waymouth, Heather Slater, Angharad Goode, Katie Allin, Maria Kowalczuk (Switzerland, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Attitudes and Perceptions of Biomedical Journal Editors in Chief Toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scholarly Publishing Process

Jeremy Ng, Malvika Krishnamurthy, Gursimran Deol, Wid Al-Khafaji, Vetrivel Balaji, Magdalene Abebe, Jyot Adhvaryu, Tejas Karrthik, Pranavee Mohanakanthan, Adharva Vellaparambil, Lex Bouter, R. Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker, Hervé Maisonneuve, Ana Marušić, David Moher (Canada, Croatia, France, Germany, Netherlands)
Abstract | Article published in Res Integr Peer Rev 10, 19 (2025). doi:10.1186/s41073-025-00178-8

Attitudes and Perceptions Toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Medical Journal Peer Review: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional Survey

Jeremy Ng, Daivat Bhavsar, Neha Dhanvanthry, Lex Bouter, Teresa Chan, Holger Cramer, Annette Flanagin, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker, Hervé Maisonneuve, Ana Marušić, David Moher (Canada, Croatia, France, Germany, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract

Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS’24 Experiment

Alexander Goldberg, Ihsan Ullah, Thanh Gia Hieu Khuong, Benedictus Rachmat, Zhen Xu, Isabelle Guyon, Nihar Shah (France, United States)
Abstract

Accuracy and Precision of a Neural Network Author Name Disambiguator

Vicente Amado Olivo, Wolfgang Kerzendorf, Nutan Chen, Joshua Shields, Bangjing Lu, Andreas Flörs (Germany, United States)
Abstract

An AI-assisted Analysis of Published PeerJ Open Peer Reviews

Peiling Wang, Dietmar Wolfram, Scott Shumate (United States)
Abstract

Comparing Observational Exposure-Phenotype Correlations With Large Language Model Predictions

Chirag Patel, Arjun Manrai, Randall Ellis, John Ioannidis (United States)
Abstract

Pragmatic Assessment of Different AI Large Language Models for Extraction of CONSORT Items From Randomized Controlled Trials Before Peer Review

Nicola Di Girolamo, Reint Meursinge Reynders, Ugo Di Girolamo (Netherlands, United States)
Abstract

Artificial Intelligence Editorial Policies and Reporting Standards in Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Journals

Josh Major, Kurt Mahnken, Alec Young, Cameron O’Brien, Andrew Tran, Patrick Crotty, Alica Ford, Matt Vassar (United States)
Abstract

Enhancing Research Integrity in Abstract Submissions With a Hybrid AI-Human Post-Review Process

Heather Goodell, Chirag (Jay) Patel Jonathan Schultz, Christine Beaty, Shilpi Mehra (United Arab Emirates, United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Policies on Artificial Intelligence Among Academic Publishers

Jeremy Ng, Daivat Bhavsar, Laura Duffy, Hamin Jo, Cynthia Lokker, R.Brian Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Ana Marušić (Canada, Croatia, Germany)
Abstract

Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools by Authors and Reviewers of the Journal Eurosurveillance

Eva Sarachaga, Ines Steffens (Sweden)
Abstract

Use of an AI Peer Review Panel to Assess Clarity, Novelty, and Impact

Pawin Taechoyotin, Daniel Acuna (United States)
Abstract

Reviewer Rating Variability and Confidence and Language Model Sentiment Prediction of Machine Learning Conference Papers

Yidan Sun, Mayank Kejriwal (United States)
Abstract
 

Authorship and Contributorship

In-person
Co–First Authors and Co–Corresponding Authors in the Chinese Medical Journal and JAMA

Ting Gao, Xiuyuan Hao (China)
Abstract

Authorship and Contributorship Criteria and Practices at the Annals of African Surgery

Cecilia Munguti, James Kiilu, James Kigera, Michael Mwachiro (Kenya)
Abstract

Integration of Credit and Accountability Principles in Authorship Policies of Science Journals and Research Institutions

Mohammad Hosseini, Sofie Adams, Yensi Flores, Kathleen Jamieson, Joerg Heber, Jennifer Heimberg, Veronique Kiermer, Arthur Lupia, Ana Marušić, Beau Nielsen, Magdalena Skipper, Geeta Swamy, Susan Wolf (Croatia, Ireland, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Authors Who Publish in a Journal and Likelihood to Serve as Reviewers

Stephan Fihn, Roy Perlis Jacob Kendall-Taylor, Annette Flanagin (United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Compiling the Publications Produced by Medical Writing

Maud Bernisson (France)
Abstract
 

Bias

In-person
Topic and Knowledge-Base Interdisciplinarity in Manuscripts Submitted to Physical Science Journals vs Editorial Decision and Reviewer Positivity

Sidney Xiang, Daniel Romero, Misha Teplitskiy (United States)
Abstract

The Influence of Promotional Language on Evaluations of Biomedical Literature: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Brian Budgell, Neil Millar (Canada, Japan)
Abstract

Unraveling the Spin and Selective Reporting in Medical AI Research: A Cross-Sectional Meta-Research Study

Vincent Yuan, Aidan Christopher Tan (Australia)
Abstract

A Comparison of Self-Acknowledged Limitations With Risk of Bias Assessments

Joe Menke, Mengfei Lan, Halil Kilicoglu (United States)
Abstract

Assessment of Spin Among Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analyses Published in Top Pathology Journals: A Systematic Review

Griffin Hughes, Andrew Tran, Sydney Marouk, Eli Paul, Matt Vassar (United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Study Hypotheses and Results From Superiority and Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trials

Yuanxi Jia, Yiwen Jiang, Karen Robinson, Jinling Tang (China, Singapore, United States)
Abstract

Biomedical Studies Published With Negative Results Over the Past Decade

Hannah Varkey, Florian Thomas, Elli Gourna Paleoudis (United States)
Abstract
 

Bibliometrics and Publication Metrics

In-person
Review and Publication Times Across Journals Publishing on Health Policy

Kathryn Phillips, Danea Horn (United States)
Abstract

Funding Sources and the Online and Academic Impact of Cardiovascular Trials Published in Highest-Impact Journals

Farbod Zahedi Tajrishi, Sina Rashedi, Ashkan Hashemi, Isaac Dreyfus, Nicholas Varunok, John Burton, Björn Redfors, Gregory Piazza, Joshua Wallach, Lesley Curtis, Sanjay Kaul, David Cohen, Roxana Mehran, Flavia Geraldes, Joseph Ross, Jane Leopold, Harlan Krumholz, Gregg Stone, Behnood Bikdeli (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Publication Trends on Priority Epidemics According to the Sustainable Development Goals in Pharmaceutical Journals, 2000-2024

Julia Soto Rizzato, Marcus Silva, David Moher, Tais Galvao (Brazil, Canada)
Abstract

Science Journal Abstracts Misregistered in the Crossref Database

Qinyue Liu, Yagmur Ozturk, Cyril Labbé (France)
Abstract

Trends in Citation Impacts of Original Research in Major Cardiovascular Journals, 2008-2018

Younwoo Ki, Chungsoo Kim, Yuan Lu, Joshua Wallach, Behnood Bikdeli, Milton Packer, Harlan Krumholz, Seng Chan You (South Korea, United States)
Abstract
 

Conflict of Interest

In-person
Psychiatry Editors in Chief Publishing Practices in Their Own Journals

Justin Nguyen, Robert Rubin (United States)
Abstract | Article published in Accountability in Research, 1–9. doi:10.1080/08989621.2025.2551166

Prevalence and Nature of Conflict of Interest Disclosures in Published Health Technology Assessment Reports

Miro Vukovic, Ana Marušić (Croatia)
Abstract

Development of a Tool for Addressing Conflicts of Interest in Trials (TACIT) for Use in Systematic Reviews

Andreas Lundh, Isabelle Boutron, Lesley Stewart, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson (Denmark, France, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Corporate Influence on Peer-Reviewed Research: Insights From BP’s Deepwater Horizon Response

Marc-André Gagnon, Blue Miaoran Dong (Canada)
Abstract

Conflicts of Interest in Research Across Scholarly Disciplines

Helena Van Beersel Krejcikova, Christoffer Korfitsen, Lisa Bero, Jason Dana, David Dorman, Quinn Grundy, Ibo van de Poel, Morten Rosenmeier, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Andreas Lundh (Canada, Denmark, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract

A Taxonomy-Based Guideline Framework for Conflict of Interest Disclosures (CoST)

Pritha Sarkar, Ruth Whittam, Leslie McIntosh (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Navigating the Challenges of Competing Interest Disclosures in Academic Publishing

Julia Gunn, Coromoto Power Febres, Laura Wilson (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Conflict of Interest Network Robustness and Funder Homogeneity Associated With Reported Adverse Events and Deaths in Published Drug Studies

S. Scott Graham, Joshua Barbour, Zoltan Majdik, Madeline Bruegger, Carlee Baker, Justin Rousseau (United States)
Abstract

Disclosed and Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest in US Guidelines for the Management of Obesity

Alessandro Bianconi, Matteo Fiore, Maria Flacco, Lamberto Manzoli (Italy)
Abstract
 

Data Sharing and Access

In-person
Data Availability Statements in Health Research in Articles and Journal Policies in Korea

Sue Kim, Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi (South Korea)
Abstract

Metrics of Primary and Secondary Publications of Clinical Trials With Data Shared on the YODA Project Platform

Erfan Taherifard, Hollin Hakimian, Maryam Mooghali, Sahil Mane, Mengyuan Fu, Stephen Bamford, Karla Childers, Nihar Desai, Cary Gross, Debbie Hewens, Harlan Krumholz, Richard Lehman, Jessica Ritchie, Tamsin Sargood, Joshua Wallach, Molly Willeford, Joseph Ross (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Data Sharing Statement Reporting Across Medical Specialties

Eli Paul, Griffin Hughes, Alex Hagood, Matt Vassar (United States)
Abstract
 

Diversity and Inclusion

In-person
Retraction Prevalence and Gender Imbalance Among Highly-Cited Authors and Among All Authors Across Scientific Disciplines

John Ioannidis, Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Antonio Cristiano, Guillaume Roberge, Stefania Boccia, Jeroen Baas (Canada, Italy, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract

Academic Institutional Affiliations and Gender of Authors, Editorial Board Members, and Editors of Journals

Ulrike Muller, Marie Schwaner, Ksenia Keplinger (Germany, United States)
Abstract

Diversity Among Reviewers Assigned to Evaluate a Paper as a Factor in Diversifying Perspective and Improving the Peer Review Process in Computer Science

Navita Goyal, Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar Shah, Hal Daumé III (Russia, United States)
Abstract

Geographical Representation of Author Country Among Peer Reviewers and Publishing Success at 60 STEM Journals

James Zumel Dumlao, Misha Teplitskiy (United States)
Abstract

Author Responses to Editorial Guidance on Reporting of Sex, Gender, Race and Ethnicity Data

Mabel Chew, Taissa Vila, Jashelle Caga-Meller, Zoe Mullan, Diana Samuel (Australia, Brazil, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Representation of Authors from Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) in Trials With Participants From LMICs

Harleen Marwah, Abarna Pearl, Christos Kotanidis, Sarah Gorey, Darren Taichman, Mary Beth Hamel (United States)
Abstract

Evolution of Authorship Diversity in African Surgical Research Over 2 Decades

Vincent Kipkorir, Godfrey Philipo, Mumba Chalwe-Kaja, Tihitena Negussie, Michael Mwachiro, Robert Parker, Seke Kazuma, Stella Itungu, Abebe Bekele (Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia)
Abstract

Virtual
Integrating Indigenous Knowledge Into Peer Review Processes in Nigerian Environmental and Health Research

Oludele Solaja (Nigeria)
Abstract

Geographical Disparities in Navigating Rejection in Scientific Publication

Hong Chen, Chris Rider, David Jurgens, Misha Teplitskiy (United States)
Abstract

Editorial Landscape of Journals in Kenya, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Mozambique

Patrick Amboka, Daniel Krugman, Tony Aloo (Kenya, United States)
Abstract
 

Editorial and Peer Review Processes

In-person
Effects of Peer Review and Editorial Workflows in Decision-Making at a Diamond Open Access Journal

Tais Galvao, Everton Silva, Jorge Barreto, Marcus Silva (Brazil)
Abstract

Reminding Peer Reviewers to Comment on Reporting Items as Instructed by the Journal: An Analysis of 2 Randomized Trials

Hillary Wnfried Ramirez, Malena Chiaborelli, Christof Schönenberger, Katie Mellor, Alexandra Griessbach, Paula Dhiman, Pooja Gandhi, Szimonetta Lohner, Arnav Agarwal, Ayodele Odutayo, Michael Schlussel, Philippe Ravaud, David Moher, Matthias Briel, Isabelle Boutron, Sally Hopewell, Sara Schroter, Benjamin Speich (Canada, France, Hungary, Switzerland, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Differences Between Manuscripts Versions: A Living Review and Series of Meta-Analyses

Mario Malički, Ana Jerončić, Gerben Ter Riet, Lex Bouter, John Ioannidis, IJsbrand Aalbersberg, Steven Goodman (Croatia, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract

Quality of Patient Reviewer Comments and Association With Author and Editor Responses

Melecia Miller, Vera Nezgovorova, Ilana Kersch, Mohamed Elsaid, Marina Broitman (United States)
Abstract

Factors Associated With Outcomes of Appeals of Manuscripts Initially Rejected by a General Medical Journal

Matthew Stanbrook, Shannon Charlebois, George Tomlinson, Meredith Weinhold (Canada)
Abstract

Automated Targeted Emails for Improving Author Compliance With Study Reporting Requirements and Other Editorial Processes

Daniel Evanko, Deondre Jordan (United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Trends in Peer Review Metrics at the Annals of African Surgery

James Kiilu, Cecilia Munguti, James Kigera, Michael Mwachiro (Kenya)
Abstract

Impact of a Novel Checklist on the Peer Review Process

Jorge Finke, Sumi Sexton (United States)
Abstract

Identifying Methodological Concerns in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-Based Practice Center Reports: Analysis of Editorial Review Comments

Haley Holmer, Edi Kuhn, Camber Hansen-Karr, Ed Reid, Mark Helfand (United States)
Abstract

 

Education/Training

In-person
Peer Review Exercises to Enhance Trainees’ Readiness to Confront Unfair or Biased Reviews

Franki Kung, Mariam Aly, Shahana Ansari, Eliana Colunga, M. J. Crockett, Amanda Diekman, Pablo Gomez, Paul McKee, Miriam Pérez, Sarah Stilwell, Matthew Goldrick (United States)
Abstract

Virtual
A Pilot Program for Early Career Mentorship in Journal Peer-Review

Anjali Garg, Preeti Panda, Lydia Furman, Kimberly Montez, Alex Kemper, Lewis First (United States)
Abstract

In-Person Peer Review Training to Improve Preparedness to Evaluate Manuscripts

Marcus Silva, Tais Galvao (Brazil)
Abstract

Quality of an Educational Program to Empower Early Career Faculty and Trainees Through Mentored Training in Peer Review

Susan Galandiuk, Vaitheesh Jaganathan, Hillary Simon (United States)
Abstract

 

Errors and Corrections

In-person
Quotation Inaccuracy in Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Christopher Baethge, Hannah Jergas (Germany)
Abstract

Virtual
Taiwanese Researchers’ Perceptions of Errors and Their Coping Strategies

Chien Chou (Taiwan)
Abstract

 

Funding/Grant Peer Review

In-person
Multistakeholder Perspectives on Current Attitudes Toward Unmasking Reviewers’ Identity in Biomedical Research Proposals’ Peer Review: A Qualitative Study

Seba Qussini, Farizah Anami, Kris Dierickx (Belgium, Qatar)
Abstract

Influence of Using a Systematic Review to Justify New Research on Funding Application Score

Jong-Wook Ban, Hans Lund, Karen Robinson, Ida Svege, Jan-Ole Hesselberg (Norway, United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Construction and Validation of Instruments for the Peer Review of Grant Proposals in Peru

Max Carlos Ramírez-Soto, Laura Alvarado-Barbarán, Dianeth Rojas-Naccha, Ayda Luna-Mercado, Arlet Arce-Zavala (Peru)
Abstract

Reviewers’ Interpretation and Application of Research Quality Criteria in Grant Peer Review

Rachel Claus (Canada)
Abstract

Experiences and Challenges Faced by Canadian Health Research Grant Peer Reviewers

Joanie Sims Gould, Anne Lasinsky, Adrian Mota, Karim Khan, Clare Ardern (Canada)
Abstract

 

Misconduct and Research Integrity

In-person
Experience With 12 Years of Plagiarism and Duplication Screening

Markus Heinemann, Andreas Boening, Kazunori Okabe, Jessica Bogensberger (Japan, Germany)
Abstract

Vulnerability of Automated Text-Matching-Based Reviewer Assignments to Collusions

Jhih-Yi Hsieh, Aditi Raghunathan, Nihar Shah (United States)
Abstract | Article published in Proceedings of the 34th USENIX Security Symposium. August 13–15, 2025, Seattle, WA, USA. 978-1-939133-52-6

Identifying Potential Duplicate Publications in the Scientific Literature Using Crossref

Cyril Labbé, Qinyue Liu, Amira Barhoumi, Olessya Miroshnichenko (France)
Abstract

Tortured Phrases as a Sign of Possible Misconduct in Proceedings From an Engineering Conference

Wendeline Swart, Ophélie Fraisier-Vannier, Guillaume Cabanac (France)
Abstract

Virtual
Plagiarism and Publication Frauds Revealed by Dissernet

Larisa Melikhova, Andrey Rostovtsev, Vasiliy Vlassov (Israel, Russia)
Abstract

Citation Biases and Citation-Boosting Strategies: A Scoping Review of Predictors

Hans Lund, Karen Robinson, Jong-Wook Ban, Karen Lie, Birgitte Nørgaard (Denmark, Norway, United States)
Abstract
 

Open and Public Access

Virtual
Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Open Access Publishing in Dermatology Journals

Dante Dahabreh, Kenny Thien Long Ta, Angela Loczi-Storm, Olivia Lim, Dana Chen, Tasneem IS, Alexandria Kristensen-Cabrera, Rahib Islam, Robert Dellavalle, Eamonn Maher (United States)
Abstract

Public Access to Information Cited in Rare Disease Reports

Mengyuan Fu, Kexin Ling, Xinyi Zhou, Sneha Dave, Can Li, Luwen Shi, Xiaodong Guan, Joseph Ross (China, United States)
Abstract
 

Open Science

In-person
Citations of Articles With Open Science Indicators in the French Open Science Monitor Dataset

Giovanni Colavizza, Lauren Cadwallader, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz (Italy, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Automated Interpretation of Statistical Tables to Assess Reporting Errors and Associations With Open Science Policies in Economics Journals

Stephan Bruns, Helmut Herwartz, John Ioannidis, Chris Islam, Fabian Raters (Belgium, Germany, United States)
Abstract

Detection of Open Science Practices in Major Medical Journals: A Survey and Diagnostic Accuracy of Automatic Tools Using Sensitivity and Specificity

Constant Vinatier, Ayu Putu Madri Dewi, Gwénaël Dumont, Tracey Weissgerber, Vladislav Nachev, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Maud Scheidecker, François-Joseph Arnault, Nicholas DeVito, Guillaume Freyermuth, Mathieu Acher, Gauthier Le Bartz Lyan, Inge Stegeman, Mariska Leeflang, Florian Naudet (France, Germany, Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom)
Abstract
 

Pandemic Science

In-person
Analysis of Editorials on the Response to the H1N1 and COVID-19 Pandemics

Luka Ursic, Nensi Bralić, Giovanni Spitale, Federico Germani, Ana Marušić (Croatia, Switzerland)
Abstract

Consistency and Completeness of Retractions in Public Health Research on COVID-19

Caitlin Bakker, Erin Reardon, Sarah Brown, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Sara Schroter, Lex Bouter, Maurice Zeegers (Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
 

Paper Mills

In-person
Analysis of Cancer Research Discussion Text and References in High-Impact Factor Journals for Possible Indicators of Paper Mills

Annie Whamond, Adrian Barnett, Jennifer Byrne (Australia)
Abstract

Screening Articles for Tortured Phrases With a Regular Expressions–Based Detector

Alexandre Clausse, Guillaume Cabanac, Pascal Cuxac, Cyril Labbé (France)
Abstract
 

Peer Review

In-person
Librarian and Information Specialist Perceptions of Peer Reviewing Systematic Reviews

Melissa Rethlefsen, Carrie Price, Sara Schroter (United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

An Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Evaluating Interventions to Optimize Peer Review

Francesco De Pretis, Abdelghani Maddi, Ahmad Yaman Abdin (France, Germany, United States)
Abstract

Evidence of Use of Template-Based Peer-Review Reports and Concern About Review Mills

Cyril Labbé, Gilles Hubert, Wendeline Swart, Guillaume Cabanac (France)
Abstract

Virtual
Research Culture Influences in Peer Review: A Targeted Thematic Analysis of Current Challenges in Peer Review

Lesley Uttley, Yuliang Weng, Louise Falzon (United Kingdom)
Abstract

Motivations to Participate in the Peer Review Process at the Journal of Urology

Anne Dudley, George Koch, Kyle Rose, Roei Golan, Jennifer Regala, Casey Seideman, Amanda North, Kevin Koo, Kevan Sternberg, Gina Badalato, Benjamin Dropkin, Nicholas Chakiryan, Robert Siemens, Peter Clark, Andrew Harris (Canada, United States)
Abstract

Review of Proposals Submitted to Elsevier’s Peer Review Workbench

Bahar Mehmani, Silvia Dobre, Ramadurai Petchiappan (Netherlands)
Abstract

 

Peer Review Process and Models

In-person
Efficiency of Author Anonymization in Peer Review

Markus Heinemann, Andreas Boening, Kazunori Okabe, Jessica Bogensberger, Zulfugar Taghiyev (Germany, Japan)
Abstract

Manuscript Submissions Following Implementation of Guaranteed Peer Review

Yurong Fei Bloom, Matthew Welch (United States)
Abstract

Editor Initial Manuscript Review: A Masked Pilot Study

Douglas Novins, Mary Billingsley, Robert Althoff (United States)
Abstract

Optimizing Proposal Assignments in the Distributed Peer Review System of the World’s Largest Radio Telescope Observatory

Andrea Corvillon, John Carpenter, Nihar Shah (Chile, United States)
Abstract

AI-Augmented Peer Review, Collaboration Dynamics, and Human Reviewer Performance

Ashia Livaudais, Dmitri Iourovitski (United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Use of a 3-Round Modified Delphi Format to Support Robust, Rapid Peer Review

Sean Hays Tyler Carneal, Christopher Kirman (United States)
Abstract

 

Predatory Journals

In-person
Persistence and Indexing of Predatory Journals and Publishers: A Follow-Up Evaluation of Beall’s List

Pravin Bolshete, Madhulika Bolshete, Priyanka Mate (India)
Abstract

Virtual
Inclusion of Randomized Controlled Trials Published by Potentially Predatory Journals in Anesthesiology Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Study

Julián Velásquez Paz, Andrés Zorrilla Vaca, Markus Klimek, Jose Calvache (Colombia, Netherlands, United States)
Abstract

 

Preprints

In-person
Preprint Policies in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Journals

Marija Purgar, Edward Ivimey-Cook, Antica Culina, Joshua Wallach (Croatia, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Authors’ Journeys From Preprints With The Lancet on SSRN to Publication

Sherrie Kelly, Clare Stone, Catherine Fiscus, Ashlie Jackman-Juler, Miriam Lewis Sabin (Canada, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract
 

Preregistration of Studies

In-person
Impact of ICMJE Trial Registration Policy at 20 Years

Julianne Nelson, Tony Tse, Swapna Mohan, Yvonne Puplampu-Dove (United States)
Abstract

Effectiveness of Preregistration in Psychology

Olmo Van den Akker, Marcel Van Assen, Marjan Bakker, Jelte Wicherts (Netherlands)
Abstract

Registration of Observational Studies of Interventions: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Journal Policies

Cecilie Jespersen, Zexing Song, An-Wen Chan, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson (Canada, Denmark)
Abstract

International Registered Reports Identifiers (IRRIDs): 7 Years of Experiences

Gunther Eysenbach (Canada)
Abstract

Virtual
Outcome Switching in Observational Studies of Interventions: Comparison of Registration Records and Published Articles

Zexing Song, Cecilie Jespersen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, S. Joseph Kim, Rob Fowler, Peter Austin, An-Wen Chan (Canada, Denmark)
Abstract

 

Quality of Reporting

In-person
Assessing the Quality and Timeliness of Results Reporting for Clinical Trials on Antimicrobial Agents

Megan Curtin, Allisun Wiltshire, Brix Kowalski, Maximilian Siebert (United States)
Abstract

Reporting Study Design in Korean Medical Journal Articles

Soo Young Kim, Sue Kim, Hyun Jung Yi (South Korea)
Abstract

Comparative Analysis of Expert, Clinician, and Consumer Interactions With Summary of Findings Tables: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Nina Vitlov, Nensi Bralić, Tina Poklepović-Peričić, Daniel Garcia-Costa, Emilia Lopez-Iñesta, Elena Álvarez-García, Francisco Grimaldo, Ana Marušić (Croatia, Spain)
Abstract

Replication and Impact of Positive Secondary Findings in Negative or Neutral Cardiovascular Trials

Sina Rashedi, Farbod Zahedi Tajrishi, Ashkan Hashemi, Isaac Dreyfus, Nicholas Varunok, John Burton, Seng Chan You, Bjorn Redfors, Gregory Piazza, Joshua Wallach, Lesley Curtis, Sanjay Kaul, David Cohen, Roxana Mehran, Mitchell Elkind, Flavia Geraldes, Joseph Ross, Jane Leopold, Harlan Krumholz, Gregg Stone, Behnood Bikdeli (South Korea, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Public Availability of Randomized Clinical Trial Protocols: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

Christof Schönenberger, Malena Chiaborelli, Ala Heravi, Lukas Kübler, Pooja Gandhi, Zsuzsanna Kontar, Julia Hüllstrung, Mona Elalfy, Jan Glasstetter, Dmitry Gryaznov, Belinda von Niederhäusern, Anette Blümle, Jason Busse, Szimonetta Lohner, Sally Hopewell, Matthias Briel, Benjamin Speich (Canada, Germany, Hungary, Switzerland, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Adherence to the WHO Statement on Public Disclosure of Clinical Trial Results by Trials Published in High Impact Factor Journals

Carolina Grana, Lina Ghosn, Carolina Riveros, Philippe Ravaud, Isabelle Boutron (France)
Abstract

Prevalence of Prospective Registration and Primary Outcome Discrepancies in Recently Published Randomized Controlled Trials

Ioana Alina Cristea, Florian Naudet, Guillaume Cabanac, John Ioannidis (France, Italy, United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Developing a Harmonized Approach for Reporting Irradiation Protocols and Methods for Research Using X-ray Irradiators

Warren Stern, Ioanna Iliopulos, Christopher Boyd, Sidra Zia (United States)
Abstract

 

Reporting Guidelines

In-person
Challenges in Achieving Uptake and Journal Endorsement of the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) Guideline

Christopher Winchester, Mark Rolfe, William Gattrell, Patricia Logullo, Kieth Goldman, Amy Price, Paul Blazey, Esther van Zuuren, Niall Harrison (Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Transparent Reporting of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial: The TARGET Guideline

Aidan Cashin, Harrison Hansford, Miguel Hernán, Sonja Swanson, Hopin Lee, Matthew Jones, Issa Dahabreh, Barbra Dickerman, Matthias Egger, Xabier Garcia-Albeniz, Robert Golub, Nazrul Islam, Sara Lodi, Margarita Moreno-Betancur, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Melissa Sharp, Jonathan Sterne, Elizabeth Stuart, James McAuley (Australia, Ireland, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract | Article published in JAMA. 2025;334(12):1084–1093. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13350

Author Practices and Experiences With PRISMA-P 2015

Mette B. Engmose, An-Wen Chan, Kerry Dwan, Carsten Hinrichsen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Lesley Stewart, Camilla Nejstgaard (Canada, Denmark, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Development of a Reporting Guideline on Health Equity in Observational Research (STROBE-Equity)

Vivian Welch, Catherine Chamberlain, Peter Craig, Luis Gabriel Cuervo, Omar Dewidar, Holly Ellingwood, Elizabeth Ghogomu, Billie Jo Hardy, Tanya Horsley, Sonya Faber, Condy Feng, Damian Francis, Sarah Funnell, Alison Krentel, Janet Jull, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Julian Little, Lovelin Lum Niba, Tamara Kredo, Zack Marshall, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Michael Mahande, Stuart Nicholls, Miriam Nkangu Nguilefem, Ekwaro Obuku, Oyekola Oloyede, Ebenezer Owusu-Addo, Kevin Pottie, Jacqueline Ramke, Alison Riddle, Anita Rizvi, Janet Hatcher Roberts, Larissa Shamseer, Melissa Sharp, Janice Tufte, Peter Tugwell, Xiaoqin Wang, Laura Weeks, Charles Wisonge, Luke Wolfenden, Taryn Young (Australia, Cameroon, Canada, Ghana, Ireland, Kenya, New Zealand, South Africa, Uganda, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract | Article published in JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(9):e2532512. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.32512

 

Reproducibility

In-person
Factors Associated With the Reproducibility of Health Sciences Research: A Systematic Review and Evidence Gap Map

Stephana Julia Moss, Juliane Kennett, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Niklas Bobrovitz, Henry T. Stelfox (Canada)
Abstract

Perception of Open Science Practices on Reproducibility Among Reviewers of Grant Proposals at Research Funding Organizations

Ayu Putu Madri Dewi, Nicholas J. DeVito, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Inge Stegeman, Mariska Leeflang (Netherlands, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Virtual
Testing Computational Reproducibility Review in Editorial Workflows of Academic Journals: A Randomized Controlled Trial From the European iRISE project

Laura Caquelin, Rachel Heyard, Stephanie Zellers, Hanno Würbel, Gustav Nilsonne (Finland, Sweden, Switzerland)
Abstract

Prevalence of Reproducible Health Sciences Research: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Niklas Bobrovitz, Harriet Ware, Corson Johnstone, Juliane Kennett, Stephana Moss, Liam Whalen-Browne, Faizan Khan, Benjamin Fletcher, Daniel Niven, Henry Stelfox (Canada)
Abstract

 

Research Methods

In-person
Characterizing Adverse Event Methods Reported in ClinicalTrials.gov and Publications

Kyungwan Hong, Mark Basista, Tony Tse (United States)
Abstract

Bias in Machine Learning Associated With Weak Baselines, Data Leakage, and Inadequate Measures Reporting

Randall Ellis, Chirag J. Patel (United States)
Abstract

Individual-Participant Data Meta-Analysis Methodological Guidance: A Systematic Review

Edith Otalike, Michael Clarke, Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala, Joel Gagnier (Canada, Northern Ireland)
Abstract

Reporting of Confounder Selection in Observational Studies in High Impact Medical and Epidemiological Journals, 2003-2023

Luis Correia, Rafael Mascarenhas, Felipe de Menezes, Jeronimo Oliveira Júnior, Marcus Almeida, Caio Azevedo, Naieli de Andrade, Viola Vaccarino, Joseph Ross, Joshua Wallach (Brazil, United States)
Abstract

Non-Inferiority vs Superiority Trials in Cardiovascular Research: Trends, Success in Meeting the Primary Outcome, and Online Engagement

Ashkan Hashemi, Isaac Dreyfus, Nicholas Varunok, John Burton, Sina Rashedi, Farbod Zahedi Tajrishi, Behnood Bikdeli (United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Estimation of an Upper Limit on the Maximum Effect That Can Be Detected in Randomized Trials of Cancer Therapeutics

Benjamin Djulbegovic, Iztok Hozo, Renata Iskander, Austin Parish, Jonathan Kimmelman, John Ioannidis (Canada, United States)
Abstract

Performance and Practicality of a Randomized Clinical Trial Classifier in Systematic Literature Reviews vs a Traditional Approach

Ambar Khan, Ania Bobrowska, Chloe Coelho, Hannah Frost, Swati Kumar, Hannah Russell, Anna Noel-Storr, Molly Murton (United Kingdom)
Abstract

 

Retractions

In-person
An Audit and Feedback Intervention to Reduce Inappropriate Citation of Retracted Literature in the Pain and Anesthesiology Fields

Michael Ferraro, Aidan Cashin, Amanda Williams, Emma Fisher, Gavin Stewart, Christopher Eccleston, Neil O’Connell (Australia, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Prevalence of and Reasons for Retractions of Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Publications by Authors From Mainland China in International Peer-Reviewed Journals

Jing Cui, Nan Yang, Kexin Ji, Dingran Yin, Chen Shen, Zhaolan Liu, Han Tan, Yaxin Sun, Zhaoqi Huo, Shuo Liu, Huiyu Wang, Xintong Zhang, Jing Guo, Yufei Wang, Xiaoqi Ren, Vincent Chung, Jianping Liu (China, Hong Kong)
Abstract

Citation Context Analysis of Retracted Articles: Leveraging Retraction Reasons to Track Unreliability in Citing Literature

Yagmur Ozturk, Frédérique Bordignon, Cyril Labbé, François Portet (France)
Abstract

Evaluating Approaches for Identifying Retracted Articles and Retraction Notices in Systematic Review Searching

Caitlin Bakker, Erin Reardon, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Sara Schroter, Lex Bouter, Maurice Zeegers (Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States)
Abstract

Postretraction References in Biomedical and Clinical Sciences

Kathryn Weber-Boer, Guillaume Cabanac (France, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Retracted Publications Referenced in Clinical Guidelines

Kathryn Weber-Boer, Guillaume Cabanac, Lonni Besançon (France, Sweden, United Kingdom)
Abstract

Retraction of Systematic Reviews and Clinical Practice Guidelines

Ivan D. Florez, Alberto Henriquez, Andres Estupinan-Bohorquez (Colombia)
Abstract

 

Social Media

In-person
Video and Social Media Performance at a Surgical Journal with Video Journal Clubs

Caden Seraphine, Abigail Chambers, Susan Galandiuk (United States)
Abstract

Virtual
Altmetric Footprint of Retracted and Corrected Publications: The Role of Misinformation and Disinformation

Ashraf Maleki, Niina Sormanen, Kim Holmberg (Finland)
Abstract

Back to Top

Speakers

Ana Marušić
PRC Speaker

Malcolm MacLeod
PRC Speaker

Simine Vazire
PRC Speaker

Zak Kohane
PRC Speaker