Note: Some links may require subscriptions.
Ninth Peer Review Congress, 2022
- Ready, Set, Share! Science. January 25, 2023
- How to Decide Which Medical and Health Information You Should Trust. Commonwealth Club, September 12, 2022.
- Academic publishers turn to AI software to catch bad scientists doctoring data. The Register, September 12, 2022.
- Reviewers award higher marks when a paper’s author is famous. Science, September 13, 2022.
- Guest Post — Integrity and Trust in Peer Reviewed Literature: Will Journals Be Alone in Doing the Heavy Lifting? The Scholarly Kitchen, September 23, 2022.
- ‘Honorary authors’ of scientific papers abound—but they probably shouldn’t. Science. September 28, 2022.
- News at a glance: Many journals, one peer review. Science. September 29, 2022.
- When emails asking to withdraw manuscripts started repeating themselves, an editor got suspicious. Retraction Watch. September 30, 2022.
Eighth Peer Review Congress, 2017
- Bastian H. Bias, Conflicts, Spin: The 8th Olympiad of research on science & publishing begins. PLOS Blogs. September 10, 2017.
- Oransky I. The Olympics of research into scientific publishing is happening now. Follow along here. Retraction Watch. September 20, 2017.
- Bastian H. Good enough? Editors, Statistics & Grant Peer Review. September 11, 2017.
- Medical Xpress
- Lab Manager
- JAMA Network
- Oranksy I. Do interim results need a warning label? MedPage Today. September 11, 2017.
- Watch out for hype—science ‘spin’ prevalent, researchers warn. EurekAlert. September 11. 2017.
- Bastian H. Innovations in peer review and scientific publishing. PLOS Blogs: Absolutely Maybe. September 12, 2017.
- Enserink M. Plan for new medical preprint server receives a mixed response. Science. September 12, 2017.
- McCook A. Authorship for sale: some journals willing to add authors to papers they didn’t write. Retraction Watch. September 13, 2017.
- The easy way to become an author. Genomeweb. September 14, 2017.
- Meadows A. Seven things I learned at the Eighth International Peer Review Congress. The Scholarly Kitchen. September 15, 2017.
- Han AP. Project to “fact check” genetic studies leads to three more retractions. And it’s just getting started. Retraction Watch. September 15, 2017.
- LeMieux J. Peer Review Congress Tries To Solve Publishing Issues. American Council on Science and Health website. September 18, 2017.
- Moylan E. What does transparency in peer review mean to you? BMC Research in Progress Blog. September 21, 2017.
- Enserink M. Few authors choose anonymous peer review, massive study of Nature journals shows. Science. September 22, 2017.
Clinical trials often unregistered, unpublished. September 11, 2017.
Seventh Peer Review Congress, 2013
- Bad research rising: The 7th Olympiad of research on biomedical publication—Scientific American
- Peer Review Cuts Down Clinical Trial Spin—MedPage Today
- Papers Trail: Researchers Track Fate of Duplicate and Retracted Scientific Studies—ScienceInsider
- Researchers less willing to share study details, according to journal’s survey—Spoonful of Medicine
- Maximizing the Impact of Research: New Reporting Guidelines Collection from PLOS—Speaking of Medicine
- Conflicts of Interest Often Under-reported in Clinical Trials—MedPage Today
- Academic spin: How to dodge & weave past research exaggeration—Scientific American
- What happened to Joachim Boldt’s 88 papers that were supposed to be retracted?—Retraction Watch
- Striving for a More Perfect Peer Review Editors Confront Strengths, Flaws of Biomedical Literature
- Of Conflicts and Clinical Trials: Researchers Report New Results—ScienceInsider
- Unreliable research: Trouble at the lab—The Economist