Media Coverage
2017
- Bad research rising: The 7th Olympiad of research on biomedical publication—Scientific American
- Peer Review Cuts Down Clinical Trial Spin—MedPage Today
- Papers Trail: Researchers Track Fate of Duplicate and Retracted Scientific Studies—ScienceInsider
- Researchers less willing to share study details, according to journal’s survey—Spoonful of Medicine
- Maximizing the Impact of Research: New Reporting Guidelines Collection from PLOS—Speaking of Medicine
- Peer Review Report
- Resource of the Week #126: Peering at the Peer Review Congresses—AuthorAID
2013
- Bad research rising: The 7th Olympiad of research on biomedical publication—Scientific American
- Peer Review Cuts Down Clinical Trial Spin—MedPage Today
- Papers Trail: Researchers Track Fate of Duplicate and Retracted Scientific Studies—ScienceInsider
- Researchers less willing to share study details, according to journal’s survey—Spoonful of Medicine
- Maximizing the Impact of Research: New Reporting Guidelines Collection from PLOS—Speaking of Medicine
- BMJ’s Godlee: Can We Trust These Results?—Peer Review Report
- Resource of the Week #126: Peering at the Peer Review Congresses—AuthorAID
- Conflicts of Interest Often Under-reported in Clinical Trials—MedPage Today
- Academic spin: How to dodge & weave past research exaggeration—Scientific American
- Can an Author be Too Prolific?—Peer Review Report
- New Reporting Guidelines For Case Reports Presented At The Congress On Peer Review And Biomedical Publication And Published In Seven Medical Journals—Herald Online
- What happened to Joachim Boldt’s 88 papers that were supposed to be retracted?—Retraction Watch
- Clinicaltrials.gov Database Reveals “Sausage Making” in Clinical Research—news@JAMA
- Scientific Journals Feel the Heat of Peer Review—news@JAMA
- Of Conflicts and Clinical Trials: Researchers Report New Results—ScienceInsider
- Unreliable research: Trouble at the lab—The Economist
- Update from the PRC—JAMA Internal Medicine Blog